Managing conflicts of interest

1) GENERAL

This policy relates to all committees and funding panels of Sight Research UK, their Chairs and other members, including the Trustees of Sight Research UK.
The purpose of this document is to minimise the potential for conflicts of interest arising and to protect Sight Research UK and those who work for it from any perception, real or otherwise, that the external interests and affiliations of its committee members might interfere with their ability to work towards the furtherance of Sight Research UK’s strategic aims and objectives.

2) DECLARATION OF INTEREST

Any persons covered by this policy, as defined in paragraph 1, must declare any disclosable external interest on their appointment to Sight Research UK, and annually thereafter. A register of interests will be kept up to date by Sight Research UK.

Interests which should be disclosed by such individuals include:
- Equity interests (if worth £10,000 or more, or more than 1% of the total issued capital) in enterprises with involvement in pharmaceuticals, healthcare, biotech or related areas, or in any other enterprise that may have a real or perceived interest in the work of Sight Research UK. Third party investments (e.g. ISAs) should be held exempt from this.

Consultancies and other external appointments (paid and unpaid), together with details of any remuneration or other benefits arising from these.

Members of the Research Advisory Board and Seed Award Panel (including Trustees and staff who serve on the Research Advisory Board as ex officio members) should also adhere to the spirit of this document and declare any other interests which they feel may be a source of conflict, or which might be perceived to conflict, with the interests of Sight Research UK. This includes interests held by the panel members’ spouses or children.

3) DISCUSSION OF PROPOSALS

Details of applications, meeting papers and related correspondence, and the names of external referees are strictly confidential and should not be discussed with persons outside the review process.

Discussions of a proposal between members of the Research Advisory Board which occur outside of a funding panel meeting should be declared to the Chair of the Research Advisory Board.

Discussions of a proposal between members of the Seed Award Panel which occur outside of a funding panel meeting should be declared to the Sight Research UK Grants Team.

If a Board member (including serving Trustees) is approached by an applicant for technical advice on an application, he or she may provide advice, but must report this to the Board Chair and secretariat (in the case of the Research Advisory Board) or the Sight Research UK Grants Team (in the case of the Seed Award Panel). They may subsequently be asked to absent themselves from a discussion of the application concerned.

4) MANAGING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Where a panel member is an applicant or co-applicant on a grant application, he or she must declare an interest and withdraw from any consideration of that application. That member will not receive documents pertaining to the application, learn the identity of its referees or receive its referees' reports. He or she must retire from the meeting when the application is assessed. Details of discussion of that application will be deleted from any papers the member receives. This should also apply to Trustees who serve as panel members and are applicants in the grant round.

Where the Chair of the Research Advisory Board is an applicant or co-applicant on a grant application, he or she must declare an interest and should not be involved in that round of meetings. A Vice-Chair will chair the meeting to prevent any undue influence.

Panel members who could be seen as a direct competitor of the applicant (e.g. they are funded or applying for funding on a similar project to the proposal under discussion) or have collaborated or published with the proposal applicant within the past three years, or work in the same institution, should declare an interest and may be asked to withdraw from the meeting for that application, or may be allowed to stay, but not vote on the application.

5) RESOLVING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Sight Research UK recognises that the majority of conflicts or potential conflicts will relate to a particular issue and as such will not present any long term restrictions on an individual’s ability to work for Sight Research UK or to sit on its advisory boards.

In a small number of cases, major conflicts of interest may arise which compromise an individual’s ability to continue in their position within Sight Research UK. Where such a situation relates to a member of the Research Advisory Board, the matter will be discussed by the Chair of the committee together with the Sight Research UK staff member who acts as the Board secretary (currently, the Chief Executive of Sight Research UK). In cases where agreement cannot be reached through this means, the case will be referred to the Research Advisory Board as a whole, whose decision should be taken as final. Where such a situation relates to a member of the Seed Award Panel, the matter will be discussed by the Trustees Research Subcommittee together with the Sight Research UK Grants Team.

Members of the Research Advisory Board are expected to declare any potential conflicts of interest relating to individual funding decisions to the Board secretariat before the meeting wherein they will be discussed, or during the meeting as soon as the existence of a conflict becomes apparent.

Members of the Seed Award Panel are expected to declare any potential conflicts of interest relating to individual funding decisions to the Sight Research UK Grants Team as soon as possible and no later than the Seed Award Panel review deadline.

In cases where an individual is uncertain as to whether a conflict of interest exists or not, they should report this to the Board secretariat. The secretariat shall discuss the matter with the individual as necessary and report to the Chair (in the case of the Research Advisory Board) or Trustees Research Subcommittee (in the case of the Seed Award Panel), who will decide on a course of action.

If an individual is concerned about a possible conflict of interest involving another member of a funding panel, then he or she should raise the matter with the Chair of the Board (in the case of the Research Advisory Board) or Sight Research UK Grants Team (in the case of the Seed Award Panel).

6) Updating the policy

Sight Research UK will review this policy and make any necessary changes every two years, in consultation with the Board of Trustees.

Last updated: August 2022